There are two confusing dynamics of the current buzz about
bad parenting.
- Lack of shame First, as parents fall over one another to tell the things that they've done, there doesn't seem to be remorse or shame. Quite to the contrary, there seems to be a sort of pride in being candid about their feelings, words and deeds.
- Redefining good Second, and perhaps more subtle, is that the whole discussion is aimed at redefining what good parenting is. For there is no way to define 'bad', except with respect to 'good.' And you cannot celebrate something except inasmuch as you regard it as good.
What are "bad parents" confessing?It seems that part of the "bad parent" trend is simply a reaction against expectations, or perceived expectations, of what it means to be a good parent. One class of "sins" commonly confessed by "bad parents" are formula feeding (and disliking breastfeeding), feeding kids junk food, and letting their kids watch lots of TV. A second class of "sins" that Kristina Sauerwein names in
Fortunately its chic to be a bad mom includes telling vulgar tales about cartoon characters, yelling profanity, being driven crazy by your kids, and delighting in the public disgrace of "holier-than-thou" parents.
Why aren't "bad parents" ashamed?The dynamic of the whole movement is that what "bad parents" are confessing they don't perceive as really bad; they contend it is just normal. What is abnormal, they say, is that parents will open up and admit it. Considering the two classes of "sins" above, they can be broadly divided into health/development and virtue/taboo. In the health and development category, breaking the norms is simply saying that being uptight about TV, food and nutrition
isn't good. In fact, they'd say, it is better to be honest about it than to "keep up appearances." With respect to virtue and taboos, the thrust is the same: being a good parent
doesn't mean restraining your tongue, cultivating perseverance, and having pity on the parent whose child has a public melt-down. "Bad parents" aren't ashamed to admit these things because they're working with a different definition of
good.
What is good parenting?Most "discussions" of good parenting and bad parenting turn into online shouting matches, full of name-calling and contempt. Why? The parties involved start with different sets of assumptions about what good parenting is, but spend all of their time arguing about (or ridiculing) conclusions. Usually, both sides walk away amazed at how hard-headed the other side is, and neither has learned much from the exchange.
In order to offer a definition of good parenting (and implicitly define bad parenting), I need to be forthright about my assumptions. I assume that parents bear the
primary responsibility for nurturing
character, competence, creativity and collaboration in their children - which is to say, their overall well-being. These interrelated qualities which parents nurture are
not equal in priority and import. If character is not the first priority, the rest will be in shambles. In other words, nurturing your child's integrity is far more important than whether he is breastfed.
What is bad parenting?Bad parenting is failing to fulfill this responsibility. It can happen by misguided priorities - like prizing a child's performance over her virtue, or her appearance over her relationship. There are two particular dangers that the "bad parent" conflict highlights.
- Pretense: The 'bad parent' camp is reacting legitimately against pretense and hypocrisy of others. You can't be a good parent and a hypocrite.
- Duplicity: Parents can't teach their kids integrity by lying to them, or respect by delighting in the failures of others. You can't lie to your kids and expect them not to lie to you.
Pretense and duplicity are not the only alternatives. There are such things as honest, humility and virtue. And these are the topic of another post.