"Coleman and his coauthors determined that a school's financial resources were not the main contributing factor to a child's educational success. It was the child's family background, they said, that made the more significant difference." (Whatever it Takes)This finding is both common sense, and a political hot potato. Of course the child's family background matters. If you look at a group of families from the same income group, some with a strong value for education and others without, whose children would you expect to excel in school? Not surprisingly, Tough notes that the Coleman report was "greeted mostly with silence or dismissals." Who wants to deal with that hot potato?
An African-American friend who lived through the Civil Rights movement, and attended an educational equity conference with me (and one of the authors of the Coleman Report, Dr. Edward Gordon) pointed out the dynamic that makes this issue so potent. He said, "If parents don't lead, then environment takes over. For the white kids in suburban schools, if their parents are deadbeats, the strong educational environment may sweep them along with the tide. For black kids in urban centers, if their parents aren't involved, their environment is only going to make things worse."
That is why the Coleman Report could be valid in its findings, while not being racist or denying the continuing educational inequities. Funding, while important, was not the main factor. The main factor was the family and the environment in which the family lived. In that respect the findings of the Coleman Report remain both valid and important for addressing the ongoing educational crisis. Do funding inequities continue? Yes. Are they important? Yes. Should they be remedied? Yes. Are they the most important factor? No.
So when are we going to set our eyes on engaging and inspiring parents?