Richard Doak has written a very provocative article in the Des Moines Register. His contention is: “If fundamental improvement is going to occur [in education], it must happen primarily outside the classroom.”
Doak points out what very few policy-makers are willing to admit:
“The most firmly established link in education research is the correlation between family income and student test scores. Poverty is the single biggest predictor of low scores. It’s a greater factor than class size or per-pupil spending.”
Happily, Mr. Doak is mistaken. (If he was right, the situation would be even more dire.) Parenting practices are even more strongly linked to student test scores than family income. There is a correlation between those parenting practices and family income, which may explain the author’s confusion. However, as a former teacher in a “failing public school,” I can say without hesitation that parenting is far more important than income or parent educational level - as many studies confirm. Even more happily, the impact of helping parents in such circumstances is dramatic and can occur even before they emerge from below the poverty-line. The Harvard Family Research Project reports:
“For children with the exceptional risk of having low income and low parent education, there were exceptional achievement rewards associated with high family involvement. Although there was an achievement gap in average literacy performance between children of more and less educated mothers when family involvement levels were low, this gap was nonexistent when family involvement levels were high.” (emphasis mine)
Mr. Doak has done well in mentioning the elephant in the room which many prefer to avoid. The business now is to engage, support and inspire at-risk parents to fulfill their responsibility.